But using the Gamma worked much better than brightness so I was able to save the video from being a total loss. It was a bad mistake to shoot at that angle because if I increased brightness too much then the Sun part of the video would come out distorted. I had a video which I shot of some people from the shade and into the sun under some trees about an hour before sunset. I find this works much better then increasing brightness. I also like the Gamma function in AVS under color editing. Thank you for your test, however, you didn't say whether the speed was faster for rendering in AVS Video Editor which was the main question. I cannot explain these differences in quality, but if I play the outputs on TV (for what MP4 is best I think), I don't see any quality differences, I only see them on PC with media players.Īpart from all that, I'm highly enjoying the vast amount of codecs in AVS, especially lossless ones and ability to encode uncompressed AVI files.
In the AVS forums, they suggest to keep all parameters of the original to not worsen quality, but that's not a remedy, just common sense. The ones from AVS and VSDC show unpleasant pixel effects in bright color backgrounds, how should I call these, wave effects? These are almost not visible in Any Video Converter outputs. I notice this by converting and opening the outputs in Windows Media Player. Both suffer from what I consider sub-par quality when compared to the MP4 output of Any Video Converter Ultimate. Actually there is another *free* software called VSDC Free Video Editor with almost the same functionality as AVS, altough the interface is looking different. I'm running a trial of AVS Converter & Editor and I notice that: Everything is possible.but how is the QUALITY? Yeah, good question.
0 kommentar(er)
